How Activism Empowers Progress

12822055_1303086719717920_1729450710_n.jpg

 

Lately, we have noticed a disturbing trend. Various members of the ME community  have been chastising vocal activists/advocates for being too militant, because they’re afraid that somehow this anger will be used against them, or they just find anger distasteful in general.

The majority of advocates are women. Traditionally, women are socialized to be polite, submissive, and not rock the boat. This leads us to believe that there may be different cultural and social perspectives at play.

In the United States, the First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of peaceable assembly, and the right to petition for redress of governmental grievances.

Americans have been exercising these rights for over 200 years. If past activists had followed the instructions of these patients to behave in a quieter, more polite manner, women still wouldn’t be allowed to vote. There would be no labor unions, African-Americans would still be segregated, and LGBT people would still be in the closet - if the AIDS epidemic hadn’t wiped them out completely.

The tactics being used by the new wave of ME advocates are standard tactics which have been used for over 200 years: writing critical articles, demonstrations, petitions and letter campaigns, with a few new twists like the use of social media and documentaries. There is nothing radical, illegal or immoral going on here. Nobody has barricaded themselves in a federal building with an arsenal of weapons and explosives.

The definition of insanity is to repeat the same tactics over and over expecting different results. The ME and CFS community has been mostly using its “inside voice” for over three decades with the occasional assertive speech at government controlled functions and small demonstrations. If it was going to bring anything more than a few incremental crumbs, it would have worked a long time ago.

Therefore, we must try something different. We don’t know which tactic is going to work, so we must try everything we can think of if we want to be successful. For example:

  • If being quiet and polite hasn’t worked, we should get louder and use our “outside voices”.

  • If working for change within the government hasn’t brought us the robust unbiased research we desperately need, we should crowdfund our own private research while we push for real government funding.

  • If patients are too sick to physically protest, we should try to get healthy people involved in our cause.

This doesn’t mean that previous methods should be thrown out the window, but we must also be open to new ideas and tactics, and practice all of them simultaneously.

As we have written previously on various blogs on MEadvocacy.org, we are up against an extremely entrenched institutional bias which believes that our disease is at least partially psychosomatic.  Accordingly, we don’t deserve the sort of robust research and treatment you would give to someone with a “real” disease like multiple sclerosis, HIV or cancer. This is not going to change without a lot of leverage.

Consequently, if we are going to be successful, we must be brave and overcome our fear and distaste of speaking out loudly and boldly. If somebody wants to use that against us, we need to expose these tactics for what they are - not shrink away in fear or attack those who speak out.

Those who chastise advocates for doing their jobs are essentially attempting to suppress their First Amendment rights. So to chastisers who tell us to be quiet, we say - “no”, we will not be polite and submissive because we don’t want another 30 years of the status quo for our disease.

 

12834575_1303093439717248_941990610_n.jpg

 


Showing 8 reactions

  • commented 2016-04-08 15:07:29 -0400
    Thank you for your comments. The comment period has expired. However, if you still wish to comment, please do so on our MEadvocacy.org Facebook page. Thank you for your interest.
  • commented 2016-03-05 13:31:31 -0500
    Thank you for this article.
  • commented 2016-03-05 08:52:36 -0500
    l was diagnosed in the beginning of 2002 (Dr Derek Enlander NYC.) l’m never in an especially good mood when l’m sick/ feeling absolutely rotten. So ..no one’s going to tell me that referring to cheney as a moron in the petition was so awful. (Just a for instance there.) Unfortunately about all l am capable of at this point is fending for myself and some computer activities although the computer’s on it’s way out. So ..any vocal advocate’s cool by me.
  • followed this page 2016-03-05 00:25:17 -0500
  • commented 2016-03-04 23:16:09 -0500
    In my 30 years of living with ME, being quiet has done nothing positive for PWME. Perhaps it is time to try something else. Let’s start with a vocal, full time lobbyist.
  • commented 2016-03-04 21:50:43 -0500
    I think this is confusing the issue. I speak as one of those who finds some in the ME/CFS advocacy too militant for my taste. This article then goes on, however, to defend perfectly normal advocacy, and does not address militancy in any way. It also makes the suggestion that those who dislike or condemn militancy favour silence, which of course is not at all the case.

    At least for me, I see no reason not to do any of the things you suggest in terms of getting louder, working outside the traditional government frameworks, and getting healthy people involved. That’s advocacy at its best. Militancy is being combative, aggressive, belligerent and bullying. That, to me, is not okay. Standing up for your rights, arguing against false information and assumptions, and complaining about weak or faulty research are all fine. Attacking and belittling those who are trying to help will only turn potential allies away…the very “healthy” people that we purport to recruit. Not everybody gets it right right away, we need to explain to them where there may be flaws in their thinking. How often does it happen that someone befriends the schoolyard bully?
  • commented 2016-03-04 21:23:50 -0500
    I agree. I have spent my life standing up for myself and, it’s been my experience that even though many people complain about it, in the long run, I get more respect. If we are quiet and “good”, we will just be stomped on.
  • commented 2016-03-04 19:00:51 -0500
    this to me seems to be an exact description of the crossroads the global community is at.

    But according to me there’s another important issue to ponder about, which presents itself in the wake of this one.

    There still seems to be a huge abyss between American advocacy, English advoacy and The Rest of the World-advocacy.

    Unless we will be able to build up a global focus, we all will continue to be hostaged by the biopsycho(a)socialists who flourished all these years by the power of isolation